Skip to main content

Blame Hamilton's Politicians for the Accessible Taxi Fiasco.

Hamilton City council voted unanimously to grant unlimited, flexible taxi licenses to the Uber cab company back in January of 2017. Along with granting generous exemptions from the plethora of regulations burdening the other two taxi companies, it's worth noting that the Uber cab company was also exempted from accessible taxi mandates in return for a pittance of $20,000 per year. (Less than half the cost of a single accessible taxi.)

Predictably, the decision to double and triple taxi capacity, in a city that was already saturated with cabs, resulted in a massive blow to the earnings of the city's non-exempt taxi drivers.

We've had more than a year now to assess the damage. What has surprised and puzzled me, is that the day business for non-exempt taxis, has experienced far less of a decline in volume than has the night shift. Many day drivers report an imperceptible impact.

The reason for this is that, at least in part, most of the cabbies who work with Uber Cab have other full time jobs, and only come out in the evenings. On Friday and Saturday nights, the Uber drivers come out in droves to skim the cream off the top of what were formerly the most lucrative shifts for non-exempt drivers. These shifts often represented the bulk of the weekly earnings for the non-exempt drivers.

According to the CHCH report (see link below,)

"Last weekend was a family BBQ. Jackson called Blue Line Taxi to see if they could get there and back with her son. She got there ok, but at 8:30pm, she couldn’t get home."

At 8:30pm she couldn't get home.

Well f*****g duh!

Could the reason there were no accessible taxis available at 8:30 P.M. is because the city's decision to partner up with the Uber corporation has gutted the night business for non-exempt cabs? What sane individual would choose to suffer through a 12 hour night shift if they won't earn anything?

To add a bit of lunacy to the insanity,

"City of Hamilton licencing department is in the process of issuing 18 new accessible taxi licences."

Yeah. Like putting even MORE taxis on the streets, and making it EVEN MORE DIFFICULT for individual drivers to earn a living will solve the problem. Not one of those 18 new cabs will have any more incentive to struggle through those deserted evening hours than the ones that are already out there. Those extra cabs will have almost zero impact upon the availability of accessible taxis and will, in fact only make matters worse for the struggling members of the non-exempt taxi sector.

This would all be quite hilarious if not for the misery and damage Hamilton's politicians "unanimously" chose to inflict on the hapless cab drivers of this city, and, as an unforeseen consequence, upon those citizens who hoped to rely upon accessible transportation.

See:

Paraplegic woman says she was left stranded when no accessible cabs were available

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Poor Uber Driver Oh my. This is a sad story. Here is an Uber driver voicing his concerns in the Uber driver's forum about whether or not his "sharing economy" gig is paying off. It's possible that this is not a genuine post from a genuine Uber driver. I see that. It's the kind of schlopp I would write if I were in a mischievous mood. On the other hand, given what I already know about the Uber scam, and the people it exploits in order to get them to employ "assets they already own," in Tim Hudak's famous phrase, it's entirely reasonable to believe that this is a REAL Uber driver, who is just beginning to figure out who is making money, or should be making money, and who is getting royally boned. (See my story about the Uber driver who drove a football player from Chicago to Buffalo for minus $38.50.) I knew it was a scam from the beginning. That is why, when people asked me why, instead of tolerating the City of Hamilton's demonstrably abs…
My Encounter with an Uber Cab Driver I had an encounter with an Uber cabbie this morning. When I pulled into the parking lot at the front of my townhouse complex, I noticed this guy sitting in a small, Uber-like car, staring at this dash-mounted smart-phone, and looking confused. He was sitting in front of unit #1. I got out of my car and started walking toward my own unit which is also numbered. It's not a gigantic complex, so in my simple, low-tech, cab driver's mind, I figure that if you are looking for a unit number at an address, the first thing you should do is look at the number on the unit. If that number is "1" the next thing you do is look at the number on the next unit. Often, though not always, that number is either a "2" or a "3" depending upon the numbering format. In my complex, the next number is "2" and so on. For a taxi driver that information can be critical. So this guy looks up at me as I am walking by, and ask…
Fluid Law and how Uber Successfully Exploited It The guy almost gets the story. One thing he misses, though, is how Uber, with its "Madison Avenue" strategy is able to exploit the natural, systemically inevitable, corruptibility of most politicians. This whole Uber phenomenon would not have been successful at all, given that taxi regulations already exist, unless they could get the politicians on board, and convince them, or persuade them to pretend they actually believe, that Uber was not in the taxi business. Hence, Uber taxis are exempt from existing taxi regulations. Most people would interpret this state of affairs as a tilting of the playing field, which it is. The sleazebags at Hamilton's City Hall came up with the term, "New Licensing Category" in order to facilitate Uber's circumvention of the existing taxi bylaw. "New Licensing Category" is nothing but a code word for tilting the playing field in favour of a politically sexy fad. I…